Which method is used for gathering feedback on instruction and curriculum?

The method of gathering feedback on instruction and curriculum that is most commonly recognized is the course critique. Course critiques provide structured opportunities for learners to share their experiences and perceptions about the training sessions they have completed. This feedback can cover various aspects of the course, such as content clarity, instructor effectiveness, and overall course satisfaction.

By implementing course critiques, instructors can gain direct insights from participants, which can highlight strengths and areas for improvement within the curriculum. This feedback loop is essential for the continuous enhancement of educational programs, ensuring that they remain relevant and effective in meeting learners' needs.

The other options, while useful in certain contexts, do not serve the specific purpose of collecting learner feedback on instruction and curriculum in as comprehensive a manner as course critiques do. Observations may offer insights into teaching methods but don't capture learner perspectives directly. Peer reviews are valuable for evaluating instructional content among colleagues but are not focused on feedback from students or trainees. Surveys can be useful for collecting feedback as well, but they may not always provide the detailed, qualitative insights that structured course critiques can offer.